The Editor JEBIMAN: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive those decisions. Editors can be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

1. Fair play

An editor evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

2. Confidentiality

Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the Publisher, as appropriate.

3. Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in an editor's research without written consent from the author.

4. Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communication with authors, can also assist authors in improving papers.

 

promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that prompt review is impossible must notify the Editor and withdraw from the review process.

 

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editors.

 

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that the author has not cited. Any statement that the observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also bring to the Editor's attention any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts with a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

 

Duties of Authors:

reporting standards

Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed and objectively discuss its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately on paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

 

Data Access and Retention

Authors must provide raw data concerning papers for editorial review and be prepared to provide public Access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), where possible and under no circumstances. Be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

 

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and words of others, these have been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author may only generally publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.

 

 

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the reported study's conception, design, conduct, or interpretation. Everyone who has made a significant contribution should be listed as a co-author. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors. Corresponding authors must ensure that all suitable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of the paper and submitted it for publication.

 

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify these in the manuscript.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

 

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, the author must immediately notify the journal's Editor or Publisher and cooperate with the Editor to retract or correct the paper.